Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
This update is part of the Lexis®PSL Corporate team’s content offering. Some of the links require a LexisPSL subscription. If you are not a subscriber, you can take a free trial here.
2016 saw the first entirely electronic AGM held by Jimmy Choo plc.
Wholly electronic AGMs are likely to be increasingly attractive to companies given the perceived ease of access for members, and the lighter carbon footprint from not holding a physical meeting. Research carried out by ICSA: The Governance Institute in August 2016 revealed significant investor appetite for more electronic AGMs. Lexis®PSL Corporate, via its Market Tracker service will be tracking this trend during the 2017 AGM season to see if other companies are following suit.
Despite the perceived enthusiasm for virtual meetings, companies must take care not to alienate other, perhaps more traditional, shareholders. This will most particularly be the case if the company opts for wholly electronic meetings as opposed to a mixture
of formats. Institutional investor organisations such as the Association of British Insurers and PIRC Ltd have indicated that it is important to retain meetings in person so as to ensure board responsiveness to shareholder concerns.
The first stage in any move toward electronic general meetings, especially if wholly electronic, should be to seek a special resolution to adopt new articles of association which specifically provide for the electronic format and also reassure shareholders
as to the procedures to be followed. For examples of clauses that can be inserted into existing articles of association to provide for electronic general meetings see our Precedent: Articles—electronic general meetings.
In addition to the core clauses set out in the Precedent, the articles should be carefully reviewed throughout to ensure that any references to the form, or ‘place’ of a general meeting are amended to refer, where the context requires
it, to the ‘place or electronic platform...’ or such other wording as is necessary to capture the holding of physical and electronic meetings. Clauses where such minor amendment is required may include provisions relating to quorum, adjournment,
chairman’s powers, method of voting and notice of a poll vote.
Many companies’ articles of association may already have broad wording that can be interpreted as providing for significant flexibility in the holding of general meetings. However, the fundamental consideration is the technical workability and security
of the arrangements. In addition, some shareholders are likely to have serious concerns if they are not given a prior opportunity to vote on a resolution to allow electronic meetings, and have a clear set of constitutional arrangements providing for
such an innovation.
Once the Jimmy Choo articles had been amended, the company and its technology partner Equiniti then developed an app for shareholder verification and voting, coupled with the use of telephones for participation. The app directly integrated with the AGM
software to allow shareholders to submit questions and vote on the resolutions being put to the meeting. To access the app, a shareholder was required to enter a unique meeting code, provided in advance, at the same time as the Notice of AGM. These
credentials were held on a secure, authentication server that connected to the meeting database via an online voting platform. A shareholder was not permitted to enter the ‘virtual meeting’ if their credentials could not be verified.
Points to consider:
0330 161 1234