Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
This week’s edition of Corporate highlights includes news analysis of the Supreme Court’s judgment in Rock Advertising Ltd v MWB Business Exchange Ltd on no oral variation clauses and the BEIS committee’s verdict on Carillion. We have also published several new Q&As including one on the impact of the GDPR on M&A transactions.
The Supreme Court has unanimously held that licence fee payments under a licence agreement containing a ‘no oral modification’ (NOM) clause could not be varied by oral agreement between representatives of the licensor and the licensee, in Rock Advertising v MWB Business. Lawyers at Bird and Bird, Clifford Chance, Charles Russell Speechlys, Herbert Smith Freehills, Howard Kennedy, Stewarts and Wedlake Bell discuss the impact of this decision which will have 'wide ramifications for all types of contracts' and give ‘real meaning and support to NOM clauses within contracts’.
In a separate analysis piece, Michael Paget, at Cornerstone Barristers, examines the decision and concludes that it will make contractual relations more certain. Any party who has the benefit of a contract with a NOM clause no longer needs to worry about the risk of an oral variation unless they have allowed the other party to rely on that apparent variation. It should reduce the risk that companies are inadvertently bound into a variation without senior management’s agreement.
For further information, see Contract law in the Supreme Court—a sensible break with the common law? (Rock Advertising Ltd v MWB Business Exchange Centres Ltd) and LNB News 16/05/2018 112.
In the first of a three-part series on the ten-year anniversary of the Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007 (CMCHA 2007), Kevin Bridges, partner and head of health and safety at Pinsent Masons LLP, examines why CMCHA 2007 was introduced and what practical impact it has had on the prosecution of work-related deaths.
Bridges concludes that a decade on CMCHA 2007 appears to have been overly conservative and its focus on substantive senior management failings has failed to capture the corporate liability. Had the offence of corporate manslaughter simply required an organisation to have breached its duty of care, and for that breach to have been gross, CMCHA 2007 would likely have resulted in more prosecutions—and certainly, more prosecutions of larger entities. However, such a straightforward test would have been problematic for an offence involving manslaughter designed to address the worst types of failing. Given its track record and the difficulties in satisfying every element of the offence when compared with the sums at stake under the new sentencing guidelines and the ease of meeting the evidential burden under Health and Safety at Work 1974, there is some merit in thinking that the corporate manslaughter regime may now be redundant.
For further information, see Corporate Manslaughter and Corporate Homicide Act 2007: ten-year review: part one.
A damning 100-page report, jointly published by the Work and Pensions and Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy committees, has accused Carillion’s board of ‘recklessness, hubris and greed’, holding them ultimately ‘responsible and culpable’ for the firm’s failure. Sarah Schütte, of Schütte Consulting Limited—a bespoke legal consultancy firm for the construction industry—warns that Carillion’s demise highlights the ‘desperate need for a big shake up in the way in which contracts are awarded’ in the public sector, while Gayle Monk, senior associate at Anthony Collins, warns of the dangers of ‘tick box’ thinking in the procurement process.
The report has been highly critical of both the board and the failed system of ‘checks and balances’ which contributed to Carillion’s collapse. It recommends that, during its forthcoming investigation, the Insolvency Service should closely examine whether the directors breached their duties under the Companies Act 2006. It also accuses the company’s non-executive directors of failing to scrutinise or challenge the executives.
For further information, see LNB News 16/05/2018 119.
An amendment has been made to the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Scotland) Regulations 2002 to clarify transposition of Article 7(5) of EU Recast Directive 2011/7/EU on combating late payment in commercial transactions in Scotland. The new provision clarifies that representative bodies are able to challenge in the Court of Session (on behalf of undertakings of all sizes, not just small and medium enterprises) the use of certain grossly unfair terms or practices in, or in relation to, contracts to which the Late Payment of Commercial Debts (Interest) Act 1998 applies. The Regulations will come into force on 29 June 2018.
For further information, see LNB News 21/05/2018 75.
0330 161 1234