Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
This week’s edition of Corporate highlights includes the government’s response to the Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy Committee’s Future of Audit report and dispute resolution analysis on an appeal relating to an unfair prejudice case which involved an order to purchase the minority shareholder’s shares (Re Sprintroom Ltd).
Additional Corporate updates this week
Additional news—daily and weekly news alerts
New and updated content
Dates for your diary
SI 2019/1010: This enactment is made in exercise of legislative powers under the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 in preparation for Brexit. This enactment is being made in order ensure a coherent and functioning financial services regulatory regime once the UK leaves the EU. It makes amendments to a number of financial services EU exit statutory instruments and to an EU delegated regulation, correcting errors identified in legislation after it was made, making amendments to ensure consistency between EU exit instruments and introducing a transitional provision. These amendments will ensure that these instruments operate effectively after the UK leaves the EU. It comes into force partly on 11 June 2019, partly on whichever is the later of immediately before exit day or 11 June 2019 and fully on whichever is the later of exit day or 11 June 2019.
For further information, see: LNB News 04/04/2019 35.
The Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee (Committee) has published the government’s response to the Committee's report on the Future of Audit. The government's response welcomes the Committee's report on the Future of Audit and suggests that the majority of the Committee's recommendations are matters that will be the subject of consultations that the government has commissioned, or will be commissioning, in this area.
For further information, see: LNB News 07/06/2019 60.
These appeals related to an unfair prejudice petition. It was found that the minority shareholder of a company had been subject to unfairly prejudicial conduct by a majority shareholder who had called for and obtained his removal as a director following a challenge to the intellectual property rights of the company. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the majority shareholder's appeal on the ground that, whilst the minority shareholder had acted in a way that was in breach of his fiduciary duty, that breach had not amounted to conduct that made it fair to exclude him from management.
For the approved judgment, see:  All ER (D) 41 (Jun).
Dispute Resolution analysis: The Court of Appeal considered that the trial judge had been wrong to postpone to a later hearing consideration of an offer to purchase the petitioner’s shares in this case, noting that such offers are generally better considered at the liability stage. This judgment provides useful guidance for practitioners advising in the early stages of an unfair prejudice claim, including on the factors which are likely to be relevant in most cases involving a consideration as to whether an offer to purchase shares was reasonable. Written by James Davies, barrister and mediator at New Square Chambers.
For further information, see News Analysis: Unfair prejudice petitions—offers to purchase (Re Sprintroom Ltd).
This document contains the highlights from the past week’s news. To receive all our news stories, whether on a daily or a basis, amend your personal settings within your ‘News’ tab on the homepage by clicking on either ‘Email’ or ‘RSS’ (depending on how you prefer to receive them) on the right hand side of the blue banner.
We have published the following Precedent in our Public Company Takeovers topic: Scheme document—additional information.
To track key legislative and regulatory developments, see our Trackers:
Brexit legislation tracker
Markets in Financial Instruments Directive II (MiFID II) and Markets in Financial Instruments Regulation (MiFIR) timeline
Market Abuse Regulation timeline
Prospectus Regulation tracker
Transparency Directive tracker
Listing Rules tracker
Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules Sourcebook tracker
Prospectus Rules tracker
New Q&As added this week:
Is it possible to amend the amount of guarantee given by the members of a company limited by guarantee, and if so, how?
Does a change in the rights attaching to the A shares in a private company limited by shares require the consent of the holders of the company’s B shares?
To view analysis of the latest deals in the market and the underlying transaction documents, use our Market Tracker deal analysis tool.
To read about the latest corporate announcements, see our Market Tracker weekly round-up—7 June2019.
0330 161 1234