Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
Check out our straightforward definitions of common legal terms.
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Access our unrivalled global news content, business information and analytics solutions
Insurance, risk and compliance intelligence using big data, proprietary linking and advanced analytics.
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
On 13 November 2020, the Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) quashed the CMA’s decision to undo the JD Sports/Footasylum merger, concluding that the CMA did not sufficiently consider the implications of the pandemic in its decision. Resultantly, the case has been remitted to the CMA for reconsideration.
The CMA first announced its decision to block the merger in May 2020, stating that the entities were close competitors and the merger would result in a substantial lessening of competition nationally. As a result, JD was required to divest Footasylum in full to a suitable purchaser. However, JD contested this decision, arguing that the CMA did not account for the impact of the pandemic and the potential detrimental impact this would have on Footasylum. (For more on this see Watchdog blocks JD Sport-Footasylum merger).
JD appealed the decision in the CMA’s final report on three grounds:
The CAT unanimously dismissed grounds 1 and partially dismissed grounds 3, however, concluded that, under ground 2, the CMA did not procure enough evidence in regard to its conclusions as to the impact of the coronavirus. The CAT upheld grounds 3(3) on similar grounds, stating the CMA did not have the necessary evidence to draw conclusions on the impact of the pandemic on the ability of Nike and Adidas to increase their own DTC operations to the disadvantage of the merged entity. The CAT further went on to state that the assessment of the effects of the pandemic is ‘sufficiently material to the CMA’s overall conclusions as to require further examination of the final report as a whole’, and remitted the case back to the CMA for reconsideration in light of this.
The CMA have responded, stating that the pandemic hit the UK heavily during the final weeks of the CMA’s inquiry, meaning that its assessments were ‘undertaken in the context of great uncertainty about the longer term impact of the coronavirus on the retail sector’. Therefore, the CMA had concluded that asking suppliers and Footaslyum’s bank for updated forecasts on how the coronavirus would impact the retail sector would be unreliable and speculative.
CMA’s chief executive Andrea Coscelli expressed her disappointment that the Tribunal did not support this approach given the circumstances and stated, ‘we will now take stock of today’s judgement and carefully consider our next steps, including whether to appeal’.
The full judgement can be found here.
For a full timeline of events and in-depth review of this case, check out the competition case hub.
Market Tracker will continue to monitor this transaction as it develops.
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
Market Tracker is a unique service for corporate lawyers housed within Lexis®PSL Corporate. It features a powerful transaction data analysis tool for accessing, analysing and comparing the specific features of corporate transactions, with a comprehensive and searchable library of deal documentation across 14 different deal types. The Market Tracker product also includes news and analysis of key corporate deals and activity and in-depth analysis of recent trends in corporate transactions.
0330 161 1234