Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Last week I blogged about the Lexis Nexis webinar on consumer protection law. Yesterday I was able to “attend” a webinar aimed at in-house lawyers about drafting commercial contracts. The speakers were Charles Maurice of Macfarlanes and Simon Stokes of Blake Lapthorn.
Charles began the session with a round-up of recent cases and the drafting tips that could be gleaned from them. The first case he considered was El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV & Anor  EWCA Civ 1539, which is one of the latest case son liquidated damages and takes the test for whether liquidated damages are lawful and not penalties a step further. The High Court set out a four stage test for deciding whether the liquidated damages were enforceable. The Court of Appeal reversed the decision but retained the four stage test – the Supreme Court will consider the case in July 2015.
He also considered the case of
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234