Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Do you like Oreo cookies?
Do you take pleasure in licking this all-American baked treat?
Fair enough, but vloggers Dan Howell and Phil Lester do.
For those in the know (eg not me), you'll be aware that Dan and Phil present a show on Radio 1 and are also professional video bloggers. (Dan's YouTube Channel danisnotonfire—'The internet support group for people that hate people'—currently has almost 4,200,000 subscribers. Phil, on the other hand, 'only' has about 2,175,000 followers for his 'Amazing Phil' channel.)
Earlier in the summer, they appeared in a video in which they took part in a 'lick race' involving Oreo cookies (don't ask). The two vloggers had been engaged by Mondelez UK Ltd to create ads on behalf of Oreo. They were both paid and provided with the product for use in the video.
Here's how they got on (remember: what is seen cannot be unseen):
A BBC journalist complained to the ASA, which regulates ads in the UK, saying that this video, together with four other videos from various other well-known vloggers, were not 'obviously identifiable as marketing communications'; in other words, they were ads.
Today the ASA agreed.
At the same time, it issued guidance for vloggers on how to avoid making the same mistake as the Oreo vloggers by making it clear when a vlog amounts to advertising:
In its guide, the regulator makes it clear that:
The CAP Code applies to marketing communications on video blogs (“vlogs”) in the same way as it would to marketing communications which appear on blogs or other online sites.
When it comes to Social Media, numerous marketers have fallen foul of the ASA by blurring the line, i
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234