Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
As we hurtle towards 2016 at an alarming rate, the Commercial PSL Team are here to provide you with a whistle-stop tour of the key commercial developments from November:
Contracts: Supreme Court rules on penalties in Parking Eye and Cavendish v Talal El Makdessi cases
At the beginning of the month, the Supreme Court handed down its joint judgment in ParkingEye Limited v Beavis, and Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi  UKSC 67, two associated cases on penalty clauses.
In one of the most hotly anticipated commercial decisions of the year, the court reviewed the development of the law of penalties and clarified the test for assessing whether a clause is an unenforceable penalty.
The issues in ParkingEye were whether an £85 overstay charge in a private car park was an unenforceable penalty and whether it was unfair under the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations 1999, SI 1999/2083 (now replaced by the Consumer Rights Act 2015 (CRA 2015)). In El Makdessi, the court considered whether the penalty rule should apply at all to sophisticated commercial parties and, if it should, whether certain clauses in a share purchase agreement were unenforceable penalties.
The court declined to abolish or extend the penalty rule but has clarified the test. The ParkingEye appeal was dismissed but the El Makdessi appeal was allowed; however in both cases the terms concerned were ruled not to be unenforceable penalties. Read our blog for further information.
Advertising and marketing: ASA to start using new Prioritisation Principles from 23 November 2015
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has announced that it will use its new prioritisation principles from 23 November 2015. The pri
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234