Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
Check out our straightforward definitions of common legal terms.
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Access our unrivalled global news content, business information and analytics solutions
Insurance, risk and compliance intelligence using big data, proprietary linking and advanced analytics.
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Hello summer (well that's the theory at least).
It was clearly a busy month last month: the General Election and Queen's Speech being the two events of particular note.
So whilst the new government beds in and summer 2015 tries in desperation to get a foothold into the meteorological calendar, why not check out last month's top 5 developments:
The Queen delivered the 64th speech of her reign at the State Opening of Parliament on Wednesday, 27 May.
The speech set out the government's legislative programme for the new parliamentary session.
A number of bills were announced, which are likely to be of interest to commercial lawyers:
Other bills announced in the speech cover a proposed five-year freeze on increases in VAT, income tax and National Insurance contributions, proposals for the granting of further devolved powers to the Scottish Parliament, and the creation of a 'Northern Powerhouse' through elected metro-mayors and continued legislation for high-speed rail links.
It is notable that there was no proposed bill on the controversial abolition of the Human Rights Act 1998; the government intends to launch a consultation before taking further steps.
For more information, see our previous blog post: Queen's Speech 2015: a guide for commercial lawyers.
The Committee on Advertising Practice (CAP) has changed the provisions of the UK Code of Advertising, Sales Promotion and Direct Marketing that affect sales promotions (section 8).
The changes follow a consultation in 2014 and aim to ensure that the rules remain consistent with Directive 2005/29/EC, the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (UPCD) and the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations, which implement the UCPD in UK law.
The new rules took effect from 1 May 2015. Most of the final amendments allow greater flexibility for promoters to plan their promotions while ensuring that all the information required by consumers to make a decision on whether to participate, is clearly provided at each relevant stage.
The CAP has also issued guidance on sales promotions.
During the month, the CAP also ssued guidance for advertisers on misleading advertising and a ‘quick guide’ to comparative advertising (ie four key things to think about before running a comparative ad).
How will the courts apply the rule against penalties to a consumer contract?
Peter Mellett, consultant solicitor at Cubism Law, and Rachel Ledson, in-house counsel at ParkingEye Ltd, examine the issues raised in ParkingEye v Beavis.
In their view, the case is relevant to anyone entering into a contract subject to English law, which stipulates the amount of damages payable on breach of contract. Lawyers should ensure that a court would not find the amount stipulated to be extravagant or unconscionable, or in the words of the court, 'grossly disproportionate'. The court will consider not only commercial justifications for the magnitude of the stipulation, but additionally social reasons, when deciding, if such a stipulation is an unenforceable penalty.
See also our blog post on the case.
In Jaouad El Majdoub v CarsOnTheWeb, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) considered the status of 'click-wrap' agreements (namely, where terms and conditions are displayed and accepted by a customer on a website) in the context of article 23(2) of Regulation (EC) 44/2001, Brussels I.
The issue to be decided was whether a contract created by click-wrapping could result in a valid jurisdiction agreement concluded by electronic means under that article. In a decision that will provide a degree of comfort to website operators, the CJEU decided that there was a valid jurisdiction agreement because the applicant had clicked on a box to expressly accept the terms and conditions and a durable record was available to download.
It should be noted, however, that this case involved an agreement between businesses. Click-wrapping under the consumer distance selling Directive 97/7/EC does not result in a valid jurisdiction agreement, as explained by the CJEU in Content Services v Bundesarbeitskammer.
The Belfast County Court has ruled that a Christian bakery business had no justification for its refusal to make a cake featuring the Sesame Street characters Bert and Ernie with the words 'Support Gay Marriage'. As such, it had unlawfully discriminated against the plaintiff on grounds of sexual orientation, religious belief and political opinion. The company was ordered to pay damages of £500.
In giving the judgment, the court decided that the decision did not give rise to any incompatibility between the rights of the bakery company under the European Convention on Human Rights and the rights of the plaintiff under the anti-discrimination laws of Northern Ireland.
The Equality Commission for Northern Ireland welcomed the decision, saying: 'In reaching her decision, the judge affirmed the position under the law—that the rights of people to hold religious beliefs is protected, as is the right to manifest them—but that they cannot do so in the commercial sphere in a way which is contrary to the rights of others.'
The bakery is looking to appeal the decision.
So, if you’d like to receive all of the month’s highlights delivered straight to your email inbox in handy PDF format, then subscribe to our free monthly highlights newsletter using the sign-up box on the right. Otherwise, do feel free to let us have your comments below as always...
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
0330 161 1234