Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
The Consumer Prices Index (eg inflation) is currently sitting at a relatively low 2.0%.
That said, this figure seems pretty academic for many people. Many staples of daily life seem to be going up at more than this amount. In true tabloid-speak, consumers are seeing 'inflation-busting price hikes' in many of the basics of life from utility bills to train fares.
So how legal are such 'price hikes' in consumer contracts?
Let's have a look at the Unfair Terms in Consumer Contract Regulations 1999.
In essence, consumer terms must be fair and reasonable. Unfair terms may be unlawful and not binding on the consumer. A term will be unfair if, contrary to the requirement of good faith, it gives rise to a significant imbalance in the commercial relationship and the imbalance is to the consumer's detriment.
So far, so good; but what about when a business wants to set the price for a product or service? What about when it wants to increase it at a later date?
Under these regulations, terms in consumer contracts which set the initial price are 'core terms' of the contract and are exempt from the test of fairness as long as they meet the plain language requirement.
Therefore this would be allowed:
The price of the services is £100 (plus VAT at the applicable rate)
Notwithstanding the generality of the foregoing, the price for the Deliverables shall be (GBP)£100 (one hundred pounds sterling) or, at the absolute discretion of the vendor, at a price determined in accordance with its standard scale of charges in force on the Effective Date exclusive of any VAT and other taxes, levies, contributions, duties or imposts similar to, replaced by or replacing any of it and them and all penalties, charges, fines and interest included in or relating to any tax assessment therefor, regardless of to whom any such taxes, penalties, charges and fines are, and any interest is, directly or indirectly chargeable or attributable or primarily chargeable or attributable
Now this does not mean that you can charge whatever you want at all times. Businesses do have a large room for manoeuvre under the regulations but other laws may apply to restrict how they set prices (such as the laws on price-fixing).
As for increasing prices this is where things get interesting under the regulations. Price variation clauses may not fall within the 'core terms' of the agreement, which means that they must be in plain English and be fair and reasonable.
I'd highly recommend looking at OFT guidance in this respect.
Take this term:
All prices are subject to alteration without notice and the price applicable shall be that ruling the date of despatch the buyer is responsible for all carriage charges on orders. Carriage charges are subject to change without notice.
So what did the OFT do? Look away now. This may upset some businesses: they deleted the clause in its entirety.
How about this seemingly innocuous term:
Membership subscription rates may be changed from time to time in accordance with the rules of the relevant Pinnacle Club and the member agrees to pay any increased subscriptions which may be due during the continuance of this contract.
The OFT replaced it with this:
Members who do not wish to accept … an increase in subscription may cancel their membership by giving written notice … the member giving notice must continue to pay subscriptions at the rate current immediately prior to any proposed increase until the end of such notice period. The company will refund any subscriptions that have been paid by a member for any period after the expiry of the notice.
Quite a different clause altogether!
Some lawyers think that the OFT has ‘gone too far’ in its interpretation of the regulations in many cases. They query whether the OFT always gets it right. In the end, the courts provide the ultimate guidance whether something is written plainly and intelligibly.
It is also worth noting that the OFT would only get involved if there has been a complaint. If no consumers complain about a price rise, it is likely to fall outside of OFT’s radar.
So here are twelve things to consider when drafting terms initial price and payment terms:
As for terms which vary the price that is paid, this is likely in many cases not to be a 'core team'. Think about how you do this and take advice on whether it is legal or not. Price variations can be legal, they just need to be drafted very carefully indeed to ensure that they are legal.
0330 161 1234