Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Plain English: so easy in theory; not so easy in practice.
Even the tools which lawyers use to diagnose gobbledygook, are themselves, gobbledygook.
Well they are to me anyway. Take, for example, the SMOG readability algorithm:
Indeed. It’s obvious really.
Personally, I prefer to stick to the more easily understood and well-known ‘KISS’:
Keep it simple, stupid
Or, even better, Antoine de Saint Exupéry’s:
Perfection is reached not when there is nothing left to add, but when there is nothing left to take away
So why does this all matter?
Quite simply, it can have a surprisingly high impact on how persuasive your work is.
Recently, American scholar, Adam Feldman at the University of Southern California, studied 9,452 merit briefs from 1946 through 2013 to see whether the quality of legal writing in such briefs affected the US Supreme Court’s opinion content.
The upshot? Even though it is tricky to pin down what exactly is meant by ‘quality writing’, it is clear from his research that the quality of presentation and writing does matter. As he notes:
Attorneys that wish to give the party they represent the best chance of a favorable outcome are behooved to take the quality of the brief into account.
Or, in plain English:
Lawyers who want the best chance to win their case must write well
Below are some of
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234