Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Most professionals break into an Arctic-style cold sweat when filling in bank transfer forms.
'Check, double-check and triple-check' is the mantra. And then go back and check again 10 minutes later. After that, why not get a colleague to have a look too? After all, it's always useful to drag an unsuspecting co-worker into the 'blamestorm' that will inevitably rage if anything goes awry.
So why all this convoluted scrutiny over a job lot of random numbers? Aren't people getting too het up here?
As the case analysis below shows, get it wrong when sending a CHAPS transfer and it may well be the last time that you see the money in question.
Harsh but true.
Following Tidal Energy Ltd v Bank of Scotland plc, customers must carefully observe their bank's systems and take steps to protect themselves against making electronic payments to the wrong person.
In the Tidal case, a divided Court of Appeal held that the respondent (the bank) did not breach its contractual duties to the appellant (the customer) by effecting a CHAPS payment in circumstances where the payee’s sort code and account number, as supplied by the customer, did not correspond to the payee’s name.
The customer and the bank were taken to have contracted on the basis of existing banking practice whereby CHAPS payments are made using a payee’s sort code and account number alone.
For further information, check out the analysis from Patrick Bourke, from the Lexis®PSL Commercial team, below.
CHAPS, the Clearing House Automated Payments System, is the payments system operated by CHAPS Clearing Company Limited. The rules of the scheme govern dealings between banks rather than the relationship between banks and customers. The hallmark of CHAPS is the short time-scale for processing payments, 1.5 hours on a ‘straight-through’ basis (ie without manual checks).
Since at least 2007 a majority of UK clearing banks have processed electronic payments, including CHAPS payments, using the payee’s sort code (or bank identifier code) and account number. The payee’s name or account name is
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234