Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Before Easter, the UK Supreme Court heard one of the most significant cases on freedom of information law since the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and Environmental Information Regulations 2004 came into force.
At its heart were letters and memos which the Prince of Wales had written to various government ministers and politicians in the middle of the last decade--often referred to as 'black spider' letters because of the heir to the throne's distinctive handwriting.
The journalist Gareth Evans of the Guardian newspaper had been trying for many years to have this material published under freedom of information legislation. On 26 March 2015, the court ruled that the letters and memos should be disclosed.
LexisNexis recently interviewed Dinah Rose QC of Blackstone Chambers who acted for the Mr Evans. Here’s what she had to say on this important case. For lawyers, it’s clear that the legal significance of the case extends beyond just freedom of information laws…
The case is significant partly because of its facts—people are very interested to see what Prince Charles has written in his letters to ministers.
However, for lawyers, it has a wider legal significance. The Supreme Court has emphasised the constitutional importance of the principle that the government, like everyone else, is bound by the decisions of a co
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234