Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
To what extent can obligations in a contract co-exist? Alison Fagan of Addleshaw Goddard examines a recent ruling where an absolute obligation was held not to be incompatible with an obligation to use skill and care.
MT Højgaard A/s v E.ON Climate And Renewables & Ors  EWHC 1088 (TCC)
The principal issue in this case was whether an absolute obligation in a contract can coexist with an obligation to use a required level of care and skill. Edwards-Stuart J decided that such duties can coexist.
The claimant (MTH) as contractor, entered into an agreement with the defendants (E.ON), as the employer, for the design, fabrication and installation of the foundations for 60 wind turbine generators for an offshore wind farm at a cost of just over €101m.
An international standard for the design of offshore wind turbines contained a value attributed to a variable used in one of the equations which was underestimated by a factor of about ten. MTH’s designer, like everyone else at the time, was unaware of the error when it carried out the design. Several years later, and after the wind turbine foundations were constructed, the error was discovered. The resulting remedial works cost €26.25m.
The contract contained two material clauses:
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234