Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
Environment analysis: Amid mounting government brinksmanship on leaving the EU without a deal in place, concern persists at the harm that could be done to environmental standards under such a course of action. Christopher Badger, of 6 Pump Court, outlines a current situation in which statements of intent have been made, but where substance is lacking and resources will be stretched.
First published in LexisPSL. Click here for a free trial. LexisPSL includes a Practice Note on the possible implications of Brexit on environmental law.
The notice that concerns upholding environmental standards in the event of a no-deal Brexit is just over 1,100 words long and principally confirms that, due to the operation of EU(W)A 2018, all existing EU environmental law will continue to operate in UK law. The notice goes on to state that the government will amend current legislation to correct references to EU legislation, transfer powers from EU institutions to domestic institutions and ensure we meet international agreement obligations, and that the legislative framework will then be changed to leave the natural environment in a better state than we inherited it. This is, on any estimation, a significant legislative undertaking but little detail is given about how and when this will occur. The notice suggests that much of that detail (about, for instance, the regulation of obligations in the absence of the EU Commission) will be fleshed out in the Environment Bill 2018.
To highlight one example, Jacob Rees Mogg has recently referred to the EU regulation for Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) as a potential barrier to trade, creating as it does environmental protections that in his view have the potential to cost businesses money and deter trade. Despite the rhetoric of the government to maintain environmental standards, there may be the temptation to sacrifice environmental standards in favour of attracting economic investment. Although it is proposed that the UK will maintain at least a system of equivalence with the EU, there is no detail as to what is meant by the concept of equivalence and who would be responsible for assessing it.
There is little suggestion in another notice on the using and trading of ozone depleting substances that the government wishes to depart from the current EU system (which establishes a stepped reduction in the use of such gases until 2030) but it is suggested that the Environment Agency will be required to establish and administer a new IT system to track and report on the use of these chemicals.
As to the reporting of CO2 emissions for new cars and vans, given the interconnectedness of the automobile industry there is unsurprisingly little suggestion that the overall regulatory scheme would change but the Department for Transport suggests that the existing EU Regulations would be transposed into domestic law through a statutory instrument which would additionally correct a number of deficiencies. However, similarly as with other notices, we are told that detail on the arrangements to maintain current environmental protections would be subject to stakeholder engagement and Parliamentary approval.
In summary then, while these are a helpful set of papers they do no more than set out an outline of how the government sees a no-deal Brexit unfolding. Huge amounts of Parliamentary and stakeholder time will be required to effect the proposed changes and the needs of the environment will, of course, be competing with all the other government departments which will also need to develop their own alternative legislative frameworks.
Interviewed by Julian Sayarer.
The views expressed by our Legal Analysis interviewees are not necessarily those of the proprietor.
0330 161 1234