Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
What is the extent of a local authority’s obligations to remove alterations and reinstate premises under the terms of a sub-lease of commercial property? Ross Thomson of Harper Macleod comments on a Supreme Court ruling which provides useful guidance and clarification in relation to what is a key issue for landlords and tenants in commercial leases.
L Batley Pet Products Ltd v North Lanarkshire Council  UKSC 27,  All ER (D) 57 (May)
The parties disagreed on whether the respondent council was obliged to remove its alterations and reinstate the sub-let premises on the expiry of the sub-lease when the request to do so was made orally and not put in writing before the sub-lease expired. The Extra Division of the Inner House of the Court of Session held that writing was required and the appellant appealed. The Supreme Court, in allowing the appeal, held that neither the sub-lease nor a minute of agreement authorising alterations to the sub-let premises had required such request to be in writing.
The decision relates to the extent of North Lanarkshire Council’s (NLC) obligations to remove alterations and reinstate premises under the terms of a sub-lease of commercial property where Batley was the landlord and NLC the tenant.
The Supreme Court considered the correct interpretation of what is quite standard wording in commercial leases and minutes of agreements (licences for works) dealing with consent to alterations. In this case, the minute of agreement between the parties consenting to alteration works by NLC (the agreement) did not expressly require Batley to give notice in writing to NLC of its requirement for NLC to remove the alterations at the expiry of the lease between the parties to which the agreement related
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234