Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
The tenant’s ‘holding’, for the purposes of ss 23(3) and 32 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954 (LTA 1954), includes all the property comprised in the tenancy but excluding any part not occupied by the tenant or an employee for business purposes. The tenant has no right to a new lease for any part that doesn’t fall within this.
Given that the first floor is sublet, is the holding then limited to the ground floor only? If so, then the landlord need only offer a new lease of the ground floor and no compensation would be payable for the first floor.
If, however, the holding does include the first floor, then the landlord’s notice will likely be invalid for failing to offer a new tenancy of the whole. The landlord should instead have served an opposed section 25 notice, opposing the grant of a new tenancy in its entirety and setting out its reasons. Here, they would be relying on their intention to redevelop the holding or part of it (as further explained in our Practice Note Grounds of opposition: ground (f) – demolition, construction, reconstruction and substantial works). If such notice was served, the landlord can apply to the court for an order to terminate without granting a new tenancy (see our Practice Note Section 29(2) – order for the termination of a tenancy). Where a new tenancy is denied on the grounds of redevelopment, this then triggers the right for compensation subject to one of the three ‘compensation cases’ set out in s 37.
The LTA 1954 doesn’t appear to make provision for the landlord to oppose a new tenancy being granted for just one part of the holding not affected by the redevelopment. However, if the landlord opposes the grant of a new tenancy on the above ground, the tenant may defeat the opposition if s 31A applies (see our Practice Note Business tenancies – s 31A). That is, the court may grant a new tenancy of only part of the holding where the landlord is able to carry out the proposed redevelopment without possession of the other part, and where the tenant is willing to accept such economically severable part of the holding. In this case though, no compensation would be payable to the tenant where they were then granted a lease of just that part.
For a more general overview of this topic, see our Practice Notes Bringing a business lease to an end and Summary of landlord’s grounds of opposition, our overview on Redevelopment, and associated precedents. These issues are also considered in a LexisPSL Q&A.
0330 161 1234