Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
This article is produced in partnership with Chris Bryden of 4 King’s Bench Walk.
Lexis®PSL subscribers can enjoy expert guidance by accessing some of the links below. If you are not a subscriber, you can take a free Lexis®PSL Property trial here.
There was a historic disposal of a mixed use building (over 15 years ago) and section 5 notices under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 (LTA 1987) were not served on two residential tenants. The building is now being sold again and section 5 notices have been served. One of the long residential leaseholders acquired his interest a number of years after the previous
sale. In order to challenge the historic disposal, who are the qualifying tenants for that purpose given that one of the tenants acquired his interest after the previous sale?
Also, can the existing seller of the building serve a section 18 notice under the LTA 1987 in respect of the current proposed disposal and against the previous disposal?
In Westleigh Properties Limited v Green, the freehold was acquired by the tenants some 16 years after the disposal in breach. An historic failure to serve a section 5 notice therefore can have long-running consequences.
In the case study scenario, notices were not served on two tenants. It is not clear whether the tenants who were served (if any were served) formed the requisite majority. If they did, and chose not to exercise the right, then it is likely that there
will be no issue over the previous failure.
The number of tenants is relevant because LTA 1987, s 10(2) provides that a landlord who has not served a notice on all of the qualifying tenants, but has done so on not less than 90% of them, or, where the qualifying tenants number less than ten, on all but one of
them, will be treated as having duly served notice. This will not assist however in respect of the leaseholder who acquired the tenancy after the original disposal, as the obligation is to serve on the qualifying tenants at that time.
The right to exercise the provisions of the LTA 1987 accrues, as noted above, to qualifying tenants. While the LTA 1987 is silent expressly as to when the qualifying tenant must be a tenant, it is implicit from the use of the word ‘is’ in LTA 1987, s 3(1) that the qualifying tenant must be a tenant at the time that the LTA 1987 operates—ie at the time of the disposal. It follows that the tenant who acquired the flat subsequent to the first disposal does not have a right in respect of that first disposal, though his predecessor as leaseholder
would do. In theory, the previous leaseholder could, with the requisite majority of other tenants, still exercise the right to compel sale. If, however, there are insufficient other tenants to form that majority, there is no real risk.
Service of a LTA 1987, s 18 notice (which is a notice served by the purchaser on qualifying tenants inviting them to confirm whether they would wish to avail themselves of the right of first refusal, and which, where more than 50% of the
tenants confirm that they would not) will not assist in respect of the original breach, due to the provisions of LTA 1987, s 18(3), which provides that the section has that effect in relation only to that disposal.
This is a complicated and difficult area of the law, with limited case law to provide guidance and potential criminal consequences. In the circumstances it is essential that specialist legal advice be sought at the earliest opportunity, to include
as appropriate the potential for deeds of release from the tenants relating to the original disposal, but these are matters on which specific advice must be taken.
0330 161 1234