Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Discussing the Court of Appeal’s judgment in Hopkins Developments Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Andrew Fraser-Urquhart, a barrister specialising in planning, environmental and compulsory purchase matters at Francis Taylor Buildings, says the case serves as a welcome reminder of the need for developers in particular to be vigilant about their preparation for inquiries.
Hopkins Developments Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government  EWCA Civ 470, All ER (D) 124 (Apr)
The inspector appointed by the defendant Secretary of State dismissed the claimant’s appeal against the refusal of outline planning permission. The judge quashed that decision, as the claimant had not had a reasonable opportunity of addressing character/appearance and sustainability issues, which had turned out to be determinative. The Secretary of State appealed. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in allowing the appeal, decided that issues of character/appearance and sustainability had clearly been live, and the claimant had had an opportunity to make any submission which it had wished on those matters.
The principal issue raised by this case is the somewhat vexed one of whether, pursuant to rules of natural justice or procedural fairness, an inspector’s decision was to be quashed because she reached her decision by reference to matters which had been debated in evidence but which the inspector had not identified as main issues.
The Court of Appeal was told by counsel on both sides that the case affected the conduct of planning inquiries generally and that is surely right. Indeed, the issues in this case may well be
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234