Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
HPA 2016, Pt 1 introduces a duty to promote starter homes (Section 1), which are new homes to be sold to first time buyers aged 23–39 at no more than 80% of market value (capped at £450,000 in Greater London and £250,000 elsewhere). HPA 2016, s 4 imposes a general duty on local authorities to promote the supply of starter homes when carrying out planning functions (such as preparing local plans, discharging the duty to cooperate and determining planning applications).
The Secretary of State may make regulations restraining the grant planning permission for specified residential developments if set requirements relating to starter homes are met (HPA 2016, s 5). This may include a requirement for section 106 obligations to secure a set amount of starter homes or a payment in lieu. He may also issue compliance directions sterilising specific local planning policies where they are getting in the way of delivery (HPA 2016, s 7).
Similar duties and powers apply to the grant of planning permission and permission in principle (PIP) for self-build/custom build homes (HPA 2016, s 10).
HPA 2016, Pt 6 enables other initiatives intended to promote housing delivery, many of which require secondary legislation to join the dots:
HPA 2016 came into force on 12 May 2016, although it was unusually only published on 23 May. The power to make brownfield register regulations and to intervene in neighbourhood and local plans came into force immediately (and has already been used, in relation to the Birmingham local plan). The framework powers for the PIP come into force on 13 July 2016 and the remainder of those above will become effective as appointed by regulations.
The starter homes duties are a challenge for the development and government sectors as a whole. The government is considering the responses to its technical consultation on the starter homes regulations and the development industry needs much more certainty about the product and the process, in particular how open market value and viability exceptions will work. The new product will be accompanied by changes to the National Planning Policy Framework policy on affordable housing so that it will essentially replace existing provision. As well as providing commercial opportunities, this new form of tenure brings its own uncertainties.
PIP offers real opportunities for short cuts, but the technical challenges on environmental assessment, masterplan structure and development parameters/flexibility are going to challenge all those involved.
Implementing the duty at the expense of affordable housing provision, alongside local plan requirements and evidence of need, is going to be a technical and political challenge for authorities.
The dispute resolution service provisions are unlikely to make much difference unless there is a very clear starting point on the use of conditions instead of planning obligations and the use of template agreements. Authorities will also be more cagey about saying that they are likely to grant permission and may look to refer schemes to the Secretary of State to block out an appeal for the protected period.
Scrutiny of local plan preparation and pressure to deliver a five year housing land supply on paper are intensifying and will continue to do so. HPA 2016 now provides an arsenal of powers for the government to control the extent of plan coverage, thematic issues (such as starter homes and green belt release), switching certain types of affordable housing obligation off and sterilising local plan policies that inhibit starter home delivery. As a result, there are significant tailwinds to plan adoption but HPA 2016 ultimately increases the overall regulatory burden on authorities, with a still-diminishing administrative resource.
PIP is intended to enhance the attractiveness to lenders of development assets, by providing a more certain outcome than the development plan allocation process. With a supportive authority, and sensible masterplan structures, it could be a much quicker process but it is totally reliant on collegiate working on environmental assessment and other issues to be realisable. Given that the powers to create local development orders already exist, the question remains as to what incentive there is for authorities to dedicate resources to it.
Interviewed by Alex Heshmaty.
The views expressed by our Legal Analysis interviewees are not necessarily those of the proprietor.
0330 161 1234