Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
Check out our straightforward definitions of common legal terms.
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Access our unrivalled global news content, business information and analytics solutions
Insurance, risk and compliance intelligence using big data, proprietary linking and advanced analytics.
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
If you regularly act on the sale and purchase of real estate - be it residential or commercial - there’s a good chance that you’ve recently been asked (or soon will be) for advice on an exclusivity or “lock-out” agreement.
While such agreements don’t guarantee that a sale contract will be entered into, they can at least provide buyers with a fixed period of exclusivity. The aim is to allow buyers time to negotiate (and incur expenses such as searches and surveys)
without fear that the seller is continuing to talk to other interested parties.
In most cases, an exclusivity agreement should be a relatively short and relatively uncontroversial document (subscribers and users on a free trial can view our precedent here). Nevertheless, it never hurts to have a checklist
handy so here are six points to keep in mind when drafting or negotiating a lock-out agreement.
A lock-out agreement is fundamentally a negative agreement. The sellers agrees not to negotiate with third parties. The Court of Appeal has confirmed that such agreements are enforceable. By contrast, it is not possible to bind parties
to a 'lock-in' agreement that compels them to agree terms. An agreement to negotiate, like an agreement to agree, is unenforceable because it lacks the necessary certainty and the courts cannot decide whether it has been observed.
The agreement can (and should) however still contain positive obligations on the parties to take objectively viable steps to facilitate the transaction (eg instructing solicitors, providing documentation, raising and replying to enquiries).
In the context of a purchase where the buyer proposes to ‘develop’ the property (and such ‘development’ includes a change of use requiring planning permission) such obligations should also include carrying out all relevant investigations
into the likelihood of obtaining any contents such development would require. These might include consents from the local planning authority, the highway authority and statutory undertakers. In such circumstances, the Buyer would likely be seeking
either a conditional contract or an option agreement to avoid becoming bound to buy the Property before a satisfactory planning permission is available.
Lockout agreements must be supported by valuable consideration. Sellers frequently seek a cash sum in the form of a non-refundable deposit. Alternatively, the buyer's agreement to spend money on solicitors and/or surveyors and search fees would probably
suffice, but a nominal £1 should also be provided to put the matter beyond doubt.
Alternatively, consider executing the agreement as a deed.
The agreement must specify the start and end dates of the exclusivity period. If specific dates are not stated, there should be absolute certainty as to when these will be. Where there is no fixed period, a contract is void for uncertainty, as either
party could break off the negotiation at any time.
Since a seller cannot be bound to agree the terms of a sale it is reasonable to include a mechanism whereby the seller can end any positive obligations where negotiations have broken down or where the seller decides not to proceed.
Typically, this would involve the service of a written ‘withdrawal notice’ on the buyer upon receipt of which such obligations would immediately terminate. The Seller’s negative obligations (not to negotiate with other parties etc) would
however remain live until the end of the agreed exclusivity period.
By contrast, in most cases a withdrawal notice from the buyer will logically operate to bring the exclusivity period to an end immediately upon receipt by the seller.
In our precedent Exclusivity Agreement the seller’s liability for costs is triggered by the
buyer’s service of a written notice (during the lockout period) confirming that it is ready, willing and able to exchange contracts. If the seller then fails or refuses to exchange contracts, the Seller must pay to the Buyer a sum equal to the
total costs, fees and expenses incurred by the buyer during the lockout period. This may or may not be subject to a cap.
It is worth noting that an injunction is unlikely to be available to prevent breach of the restrictions imposed on the seller. Exclusivity or 'Lockout' agreements are designed to protect the Buyer from having incurred substantial costs in getting ready
to complete and at the last minute losing the property because the Seller elects to sell to somebody else. As such, damages are likely to be regarded as a suitable alternative.
Lockout agreements are not contracts for the sale of a property and do not create an interest in land. They are not registrable agreements and Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989, s 2 does not apply to them.
For further background on exclusivity agreements or
to access our precedent and associated drafting notes please login
or sign up for a free trial.
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
Melissa Moore is a dual qualified in England and Wales and South African lawyer and has 14 years’ experience in property practice in England. She has worked in local government and been a partner at a regional law firm and most recently an associate director at Berwin Leighton Paisner which she joined in 2005. Melissa has wide experience in all areas of property law and specializes in commercial real estate development. She has experience in a number of sectors including hotel, leisure, offices, investment, industrial, motorway service stations and funding. She has worked on large scale strategic developments and government funding initiatives, town centre regeneration schemes and private mixed use developments both for public sector and private developers and investment funds. In 2013 she was ranked by Legal 500 as recommended for local government work.
0330 161 1234