Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
a consultation process on retentions in the construction industry, and on the 2011 amendments to the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (HGCRA 1996), Francis Ho, partner at Penningtons Manches, considers the possible changes that
could be made to the law around retentions, payment and adjudication.
First published on LexisPSL Construction. Click here for a free trial.
The retentions consultation followed detailed research commissioned by BEIS in England into businesses’ experiences with cash retentions, their disadvantages and possible alternatives. Cash retentions have long been a prickly issue within
the construction industry. Clients and main (Tier 1) contractors typically hold back 3–5% in retention from any payments due to their own contractors, primarily to incentivise them to remedy any defects in construction works that come
to light during the defects liability period. Half of this sum is usually returned to contractors at practical completion, with the remainder being paid at the end of the defects liability period (generally lasting for 12–24 months),
subject to any set-offs the payer is permitted to make.
These retained funds can be abused, with those holding them either releasing them late or even not at all.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234