Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
What are landlords and tenants making of the Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery scheme (CRAR)? Lucy McCormick of Henderson Chambers comments on the new scheme.
On 6 April 2014, the new Commercial Rent Arrears Recovery (CRAR) procedure came into effect. This replaced the ancient remedy of ‘distress’, which entitled a landlord to recover unpaid rent by entering a tenanted property without notice, seizing goods and selling them. A few months on, it is now possible to comment on how CRAR is bedding in in practice.
The key change is that the tenant must now be given seven clear days’ notice in writing of the intention to enter the premises to seize goods. This is intended to give the tenant an opportunity to negotiate or take legal advice, but many feel it simply gives the wayward tenant an opportunity to remove valuable items. Where there is a particular reason to believe it is ‘likely’ that the goods will be disposed of, the landlord may apply to the court for permission to give shorter notice. However, there is no doubt that the new regime has ‘rebalanced’ the rights of tenants and landlords towards the tenants in many respects.
The scope of CRAR is much narrower than that of its predecessor. Perhaps most importantly, it does not apply to leases of mixed residential/commercial properties. Any use of the premises for residential purposes (unless such use is a breach of the lease) will prevent CRAR from being an option for the landlord.
One further major change is that CRAR may only be used on a lease which is “evidenced in writing”. A purely oral lease is not within its scope. There is, however, no need for the lease document to be signed to allow CRAR to bite. Precisely the extent to which a lease must be evidenced in writing – on the spectrum between ‘back of an envelope’ scribble and fully
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234