Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
What are the challenges when bringing a climate change case? Lawyers and project leaders at ClientEarth and Greenpeace discuss the hurdles and what to look out for when bringing such cases, and give us some predictions for the future of climate change litigation.
Scientific evidence is likely to play an important role in any climate change litigation. However, helpfully for claimants and courts, the reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) provide an authoritative source of the latest scientific
consensus on the causes and likely effects of climate change (the IPCC’s latest report, the Fifth Assessment Report, is available on their website). The IPCC’s rigorous process of obtaining consensus among all government participants means
that courts can take judicial notice of the facts contained in the IPCC’s reports, which was the approach taken by the Dutch court in the Urgenda decision (Urgenda Foundation v the State of the Netherlands, C/09/456689/HA ZA 13-1396,
judgment of 24 June 2015).
Scientific understanding of the effects of climate change on weather is also rapidly improving. Scientists can now conclude that human activities have directly changed the frequency or intensity of specific extreme weather events, and have also developed
methodologies allowing them to attribute events to human influence rapidly after they occur (see climate central analysis). This work may have significant implications for climate change litigation (Thornton, J & Covington, H, ‘Climate change
before the court’, CarbonBrief).
While courts are becoming increasingly comfortable with climate science, lack of full scientific certainty may not be an insurmountable barrier for claimants. Litigants in some jurisdictions may be able to rely on the precautionary principle, which allows
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234