Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
It may be called the 'world wide' web but can local authorities treat online channels as a 'one-stop shop' when seeking to discharge legal duties to alert and consult the general public on plan-making issues?
And to what extent will the court exercise its discretion as to remedies where a breach of such duties is found?
Jamie McKie examines the answers - and warnings - found in the judgment of Lindblom J in Kendall v Rochford DC 2014.
What prompted Mrs Kendall’s claim?
Mrs Kendall, a local resident, challenged the adequacy of the consultation process followed by Rochford District Council in the adoption of its Allocations Plan ("the AP"). The AP is a key local development framework document which allocates specific sites and details policies for a range of uses in Rochford, such as residential and employment.
During its preparation of the AP, the council chose to limit direct consultation primarily to 'key stakeholders' rather than individuals. When it did consult the general public, it relied almost exclusively on its own website for issuing alerts and collecting comments.
Mrs Kendall argued that this was inadequate and denied residents the opportunity to feed into the plan-making process in the required way. As such, she submitted that certain policies in the AP should be remitted back to the council or quashed.
Questions for the Court
It fell to the c
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234