Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
How do the statutory provisions as to adverse possession of registered land and the criminal offence of squatting interact? The High Court decided the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act 2012 (LASPO 2012) criminalises trespass without affecting the operation of adverse possession.
Best v Chief Land Registrar  EWHC 1370 (Admin)
A claim for judicial review raised, for the first time, the important question of whether the criminalising of trespass by ‘living in’ a residential building, pursuant to LASPO 2012, s 144(1) has prevented time running for applications for registration of title by adverse possession to registered land.
The Chief Land Registrar had decided that it does. Mr Best, claiming adverse possession of the property in question, contended that LASPO 2012, s 144 was never intended to have that effect on the registration of title and should not be construed so that it did.
On 27 November 2012, Mr Best applied to register title to the relevant property on the basis that he had been in adverse possession for the necessary period of ten years ending on the date of the application. His accompanying statutory declaration stated that in 1997 he had been working on a nearby property, the owner of which had told him that the last occupier of the then empty and vandalised property had died and that he had not seen her son since 1996.
He entered the property and did extensive work to it intending to make it his permanent residence. He moved in at the end of January 2012. He said that he had treated the house as his own since 2001. There
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234