A warning against partisan expert evidence in construction disputes

A warning against partisan expert evidence in construction disputes

In ICI v Merit Merrell [2018] EWHC 1577 (TCC), Fraser J in the Technology and Construction Court warned against the use of biased expert evidence and reminded experts and legal advisers of important points to bear in mind in this regard:

"There are some jurisdictions where partisan expert evidence is the norm. For the avoidance of any doubt, this jurisdiction is not one of them."

The judgment

Following an earlier judgment determining that an employer had been in repudiatory breach of contract, the court considered issues around quantum. In doing so, the court found that it was not bound by the Project Manager’s assessments of compensation events (under the NEC3 contract), that the burden of proof was on the employer to show that the contractor had been overpaid, and that the contractor was entitled to recover losses caused by the negative impact which the breach had had on its financial position.

For our full case analysis, see: Court assesses quantum following repudiatory breach of contract (ICI v Merit Merrell)

Comments on expert evidence

In parts of the (lengthy) judgment, the court was critical of some of the expert evidence. For example, it noted that one of the experts had:

  • valued work at actual cost rather than using the agreed rates, despite there being no contractual basis for this
  • opined on causation, which was a matter for the court
  • not taken account o

Subscription Form

Related Articles:
Latest Articles:

Already a subscriber? Login
RELX (UK) Limited, trading as LexisNexis, and our LexisNexis Legal & Professional group companies will contact you to confirm your email address. You can manage your communication preferences via our Preference Centre. You can learn more about how we handle your personal data and your rights by reviewing our  Privacy Policy.

Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.

Read full article

Already a subscriber? Login

About the author:

Jon is a Professional Support Lawyer at LexisNexis, specialising in construction law.

Jon trained at Hogan Lovells and qualified into the construction disputes team there in 2011. He joined LexisNexis in February 2016. Jon has experience of acting for various parties (including employers, main contractors, subcontractors and project managers) in relation to disputes arising out of construction and engineering projects in various jurisdictions. Jon has acted for clients in TCC litigation, arbitration, adjudication and mediation as well as providing advice on various aspects of construction and engineering projects.