Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
In ICI v Merit Merrell  EWHC 1577 (TCC), Fraser J in the Technology
and Construction Court warned against the use of biased expert evidence and reminded experts and legal advisers of important points to bear in mind in this regard:
"There are some jurisdictions where partisan expert evidence is the norm. For the avoidance of any doubt, this jurisdiction is not one of them."
Following an earlier judgment determining that an employer had been in repudiatory breach of contract, the court considered issues around quantum. In doing so, the court found that it was not bound by the Project Manager’s assessments of compensation
events (under the NEC3 contract), that the burden of proof was on the employer to show that the contractor had been overpaid, and that the contractor was entitled to recover losses caused by the negative impact which the breach had had on its financial
For our full case analysis, see: Court assesses quantum following repudiatory breach of contract (ICI v Merit Merrell)
In parts of the (lengthy) judgment, the court was critical of some of the expert evidence. For example, it noted that one of the experts had:
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Jon is Head of the Built Environment Group at Lexis®PSL.
Jon trained at Hogan Lovells and qualified into the firm's construction disputes team. Jon has experience of acting for various parties in relation to disputes arising out of construction and engineering projects in various jurisdictions. Jon has acted for clients in TCC litigation, arbitration, adjudication and mediation as well as providing advice on various aspects of construction and engineering projects.
0330 161 1234