Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
Check out our straightforward definitions of common legal terms.
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Access our unrivalled global news content, business information and analytics solutions
Insurance, risk and compliance intelligence using big data, proprietary linking and advanced analytics.
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
The Department for Communities and Local Government has published a consultation on a range of plans to streamline the planning system.
The consultation closes on 26 September 2014.
Proposals to streamline neighbourhood planning procedures, increase permitted development rights (PD rights) and introduce statutory measures for deeming the discharge of planning conditions should have a fairly significant effect on the plan-making and
planning application procedures for both developers and LPAs.
The government advocates the measures as 'practical improvements that build on earlier reforms, to help more people benefit and, overall, help us get the development and housing our future growth depends upon', but there are fears local authorities could
lose control over development in their areas and miss out on valuable funding
By no longer prescribing a minimum period for pre-submission consultation and publicity, there may be concerns that developers with an interest in an NDP or NDO will not have an opportunity to engage in the process. The government recognises this and
advises that those with an interest in land allocated for development in the NDP should be directly consulted during the NDP’s preparation. Regulations already include a requirement to consult the owners and tenants of land proposed to be developed
under an NDO proposal and the government proposes to introduce a similar requirement for NDPs.
There are multiple proposals to create new PD rights. The keys ones propose to:
Office to residential conversions and PD rights have been controversial since their temporary introduction. The right is subject to a number of significant qualifications, eg excluding vacant new offices, listed buildings, scheduled ancient monuments
and certain 'exemption areas'.
Many LPAs expressed concern when the PD right was initially introduced, but experience to date reveals that these powers are now being used effectively by developers. An example of this is the approval by Birmingham City Council of the conversion of 10
floors of an office building into 120 flats in a conservation area.
LPAs can also consult with the community about whether PD rights could be withdrawn, using Article 4 directions. See Practice Note: Article 4 directions
Developers are likely to welcome the new rights, and potential increased viability of schemes as a result. However, it is likely that the absence of the need to pay contributions via planning obligations will affect infrastructure in LPA's areas and could
be challenged in future. LPAs may suffer from losing control over the location of housing developments in what they perceive to be the most appropriate places.
The consultation proposes to introduce a ‘deemed discharge’ where an LPA has not responded within a reasonable time to an application to discharge certain types of planning condition.
This is hoped to result in a more efficient process for handling conditions and more certainty on time frames for applicants. Applicants may also benefit from the reduced number of conditions, due to the greater focus on addressing issues before a decision
is made. A reduced number of conditions could reduce fees and administrative costs applying for a condition to be removed, varied or discharged.
LPAs may benefit from fewer conditions being attached to planning permission, and therefore they will need to dedicate fewer resources to dealing with discharge. However, LPAs have warned that the increased time pressure may put a further strain on their
already tight resources.
These include measures to:
There are proposals to raise some of the size thresholds for screening projects for the need for an environmental impact assessment. New thresholds have been proposed for industrial estate development and urban development projects including housing.
Changes to development consent orders (DCOs) for nationally significant infrastructure projects include:
• simplifying the process for making changes to DCOs, reducing the number of consultees and giving the government discretion to dispense with the need to hold an examination
• shortening timescales for decision-making relating to changes to DCOs and giving developers the choice of whether non-planning consents are dealt with as part of the DCO application or obtained separately from relevant consenting bodies
What are your thoughts? Do you welcome these changes? Have you say below or email the consultation.
Free trials are only available to individuals based in the UK
* denotes a required field
Jen is a solicitor specialising in planning law. She has experience in relation to a range of planning topics, including environmental impact assessment, section 106 agreements, highways orders, compulsory purchase, freedom of information issues, inquiries, judicial review, the Localism Act 2011, the National Planning Policy Framework and major infrastructure projects. After qualifying at Ashurst, Jen worked at Bevan Brittan and subsequently at CMS Cameron McKenna as an associate in the planning team. She worked as an external author for LexisPSL before joining the team in November 2010. She has written for a variety of legal publications, including the New Law Journal, Utilities Week, Planning Resource and The Lawyer. Jen regularly appears on Talking Law videocasts providing legal updates on planning law.
0330 161 1234