Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
A letter to HM Treasury from the City of London Law Society (CLLS) asks for clarification on whether 'loan agreement' falls within the meaning of 'debenture', following a recent Court of Appeal case which the CLLS has noticed has caused uncertainty in the law and seems to be causing confusion in the loan market. The CLLS is seeking clarification that HM Treasury is not treating loan agreements as debentures, and that lending is not intended to be a regulated activity.
The decision in Fons HF (in Liquidation) v Pillar Securitisation in the Court of Appeal on 20 March 2014 has very significant implications for what falls within the regulated investment of a ‘contract that creates or acknowledges indebtedness'. The letter points out that the implication, if this is correct, is that loan agreements, secondary loans, and servicing structured finance transactions as in a securitisation transaction, could all become regulated activities under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA 2000) and the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (Regulated Activities) Order 2001, falling within the remit of FSMA 2000 regulation.
First published on LexisPSL Banking & Finance. Click here for a free trial.
0330 161 1234