Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
This News Analysis provides a summary of the note published by the Loan Market Association (LMA) in which they address five key documentary areas where questions have been raised as to the potential effect of Brexit: (1) use of English law, (2) jurisdiction provisions, (3) EU references in documentation, (4) lending restrictions, and (5) Article 55 Bail-In clauses.
Although Brexit will likely affect the future financial landscape in the UK and Europe, for the most part it will not create a need for immediate contractual change, the Loan Market Association (LMA) has said. To reassure the market, the LMA has produced a note which addresses some Brexit-related concerns for LMA facility documentation.
On 6 September 2016, the LMA published a note addressing five key documentary areas where questions have been raised as to the potential effect of Brexit. These are:
For each of the above points, the note looks at potential issues that may arise as a result of Brexit. The note then discusses whether the LMA intends to make any changes to LMA facility documentation and/or whether parties using the documents should potentially consider making any changes.
The note is not intended to be comprehensive or to give legal or other advice.
This News Analysis summarises the points made in the note. The note can be read in full by members of the LMA by logging into the LMA website.
Most of the LMA's recommended forms of documentation are expressed to be governed by English law (except for those designed specifically for the requirements of local markets). Questions have been raised as to how Brexit may affect the choice of English law to govern facility documentation.
In summary, the LMA does not plan to make any change to the governing law of its recommended forms of documentation. This is because:
The majority of the LMA's recommended forms of English law facility documentation use one-sided exclusive jurisdiction clauses. These permit lenders to bring proceedings in any court of competent jurisdiction but require obligors to bring proceedings in English courts only. Questions have been raised as to how Brexit might affect the enforceability of judgments by English courts or otherwise impact on the suitability of jurisdiction clauses as currently typically drafted.
It is possible that Brexit could affect the extent to which a judgment of the English courts is enforceable in other Member States. For example, if not dealt with as part of the negotiations, the enforceability of English judgments post-Brexit will depend on the domestic law in that Member State (as is currently the position with eg New York law). However it is equally possible that EU wide recognition of English judgments could be agreed.
The LMA does not currently plan to make any changes to the dispute resolution clauses in its recommended forms as:
LMA facility documentation contains a number of references to the 'European Union' or to EU legislation.
The note states that the LMA will seek to address any appropriate changes to references to the European Union or EU legislation in due course. In the meantime, parties should consider themselves whether any supplementation to the references is appropriate in the context of the transaction.
In some EU jurisdictions, lenders are required under domestic legislation to have licences to lend. EU passporting currently allows UK based lenders to lend into these jurisdictions by virtue of them being regulated entities in the UK. There is a risk passporting could be lost on a UK withdrawal from the EU.
Members could consider including wording allowing the loans to be made by affiliates in the EU (designated entity clauses). The LMA is currently preparing a form of designated entity clause for inclusion in its recommended forms of facility documentation.
Article 55 of the BRRD requires EEA financial institutions to include a bail-in clause in any document governed by the law of a non-EEA country under which the EEA financial institution may have contractual or non-contractual liability. Currently, there is no requirement to include a bail-in clause in English law governed documents as the obligation only applies to contracts governed by non-EEA law. However, if the UK ceases to be a member of the EU, then contracts governed by English law may become subject to the Article 55 requirement.
There are a number of ways in which the UK could avoid being subject to the provision, namely:
Since it is not yet clear whether Article 55 will apply to English law governed contracts, the LMA is not recommending that they should contain bail-in clauses at this stage. However, the note suggests that institutions could consider whether to include such provisions as a precautionary measure where the term of the contract may extend beyond the expected date of withdrawal. This may particularly be the case where the financial institution is a borrower and wishes to classify its borrowing liabilities as MREL /TLAC eligible liabilities.
0330 161 1234