Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
What do banks need to know about the requirement to obtain a legal opinion when establishing credit protection arrangements? Hannah Fearn, an associate in the trade and export finance team in the London office of Sullivan & Worcester, explains the requirement and the recently-launched industry standard legal opinion.
BAFT and ITFA legal opinion to help banks’ regulatory compliance
A joint industry standard legal opinion for banks to use in satisfying new regulatory requirements in the EU has been announced by the Bankers Association for Finance and Trade (BAFT) and the International Trade and Forfaiting Association (ITFA). The joint legal opinion aims to allow BAFT and ITFA’s member institutions to reduce the cost and complexity for banks subject to EU rules, and to make it easier to do business under the English law version of the BAFT Master Participation Agreement (MPA).
When calculating capital requirements, institutions can take into account eligible forms of credit risk mitigation to reduce the amount of capital they are required to hold for a particular exposure. To be an eligible form of credit risk mitigation, a credit protection arrangement must meet the applicable criteria set out in the Capital Requirements Regulation (EU) 575/2013 (CRR).
Under CRR, art 194.1, an institution must be able to provide, upon request of the competent authority, the most recent version of the independent, written and reasoned legal opinion(s) that it used to establish whether its credit protection arrangements are legally effective and enforceable in all relevant jurisdictions.
ITFA, working together with BAFT, instructed Sullivan & Worcester to provide an industry standard legal opinion on the enforceability of the BAFT English law MPA for the purposes of CRR, art 194.1 to help facilitate this process for banks.
The requirement that a credit risk mitigation technique must satisfy certain criteria before it can be taken into account in the calculation of risk-weighted exposure is not new for Basel III. In fact, the applicable requirements are broadly similar to the requirements under the equivalent legislation under the Basel II regime.
However, the requirement to obtain a legal opinion under CRR, art 194.1 is new and this requirement came as somewhat of a surprise to the industry. It potentially adds an extra layer of complexity and cost for banks entering into credit protection arrangements.
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Neeta has been working as a paralegal in Banking and Insolvency for the past 4 and a half years.
She started her legal career at Allen & Overy in 2008 in the midst of the global financial crisis and the collapse of Lehmans where she gained most of her experience.
Neeta also did a short stint in litigation at the Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office. Neeta graduated with a 2:1 honours degree from University of London, Queen Mary College and went on to obtain a distinction from the College of Law in the Legal Practice Course. She moved to Lexis®PSL in April 2013.
0330 161 1234