Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
Welcome to this month’s highlights from the Lexis®PSL Banking & Finance team which cover the key news updates from December 2016.
The Loan Market Association (LMA) has published guidance providing recommendations for best practice when dealing with amendments to loan agreements. These amendments may be necessary during the term of the loan due to changes in the status of the relevant parties, regulatory changes or market variations, each of which may result in the need to review the terms of the loan documentation.
The LMA guidance sets out the best practice steps to take when dealing with any such required amendments and is available to LMA members on the LMA website.
The Lending Standards Board (LSB) has confirmed that standards of lending practices for business customers will be launched in phases, with the first phase due in early 2017. The standards will relate to businesses with a turnover of up to £6.5m and will replace the micro-enterprise provisions of the Lending Code.
The standards will be launched as follows:
phase 2/3: later in 2017—this will extend the standards to cover asset finance and peer-to-peer lending
In the case of Menelaou v Bank of Cyprus UK Ltd  EWHC 2656 (Ch), the Chancery Division held, further to earlier proceedings in which the defendant bank had successfully counterclaimed for a declaration that it was entitled to be subrogated to an unpaid vendor’s lien over the claimant’s family home, that the bank was entitled to an order for sale of the property. The court held, among other things, that an unpaid vendor’s lien was an equitable charge and that the power to realise equitable charges contained in section 90 of the Law of Property Act 1925 (LPA 1925) applied.
In News Analysis: Intended security after the event (Menelaou v Bank of Cyprus), Gateley Plc Finance litigation associate John Williams and partner Rob Payne, explain the litigious actions between the Menelaou family and the Bank of Cyprus UK, taking into consideration the judicial action taken and the subsequent influence on this area of the law.
A paper looking at the pricing of project finance (PF) and non-project finance (NPF) loans has been published by the European Investment Bank (EIB). The paper examines the factors which influence the borrower’s choice between project financing and corporate financing.
The paper used a sample of 210,273 syndicated loans closed between 2000 and 2014.
The EIB found that PF and NPF loans are influenced differently by common pricing characteristics, and that PF loans in the USA and Western Europe are priced in segmented markets. It additionally found:
publicaly-traded sponsors who prefer project financing to corporate financing are larger, less profitable, more financially distressed and have a higher asset tangibility
The Export Credits Guarantee Department (ECGD) is the UK's official export credit agency and operates under the name UK Export Finance (UKEF). As part of the Autumn Statement on 23 November, the Chancellor announced some new measures designed to boost UK exports and build upon existing trade policy expertise ahead of Brexit. In particular:
As a result of the new measures, UKEF's total risk appetite will double to £5bn and the maximum cover limit for individual markets will increase by up to 100%, potentially resulting in as much as £2.5bn of additional capacity to support exports to some destinations. In addition, the number of pre-approved currencies in which UKEF can offer support has increased from 10 to 40.
The Autumn Statement also included measures to support an enhanced approach to risk management for UKEF, including the use of private insurance markets, which it is hoped will create additional appetite to support UK exports in popular markets.
The Lexis®PSL Banking & Finance team have reported on the recent case of WW Property Investments Ltd v National Westminster Bank plc  EWCA Civ 1142, in which Lord Justice Christopher Clarke discussed at length whether collars and a swap transaction could be categorised as a wager. See News Analysis: When is a derivative a wagering contract? (WW Property Investments v National Westminster Bank).
The International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc (ISDA) and IHS Markit have announced the launch of the ISDA 2016 Variation Margin Protocol on ISDA Amend, which automates the process for amending existing collateral documents or setting up new agreements in order to comply with new variation margin requirements going into effect on 1 March 2017.
ISDA have also published a useful document which sets out the steps to be taken by market participants in order to prepare for the variation margin requirements coming into force on 1 March 2017.
The European Banking Authority (EBA) has translated its guidelines on implicit support for securitisation transactions into the official languages of the European Union and published the final guidelines on its website. The guidelines clarify what constitutes arm’s length conditions and specify when a transaction is not structured to provide support for securitisations for the purposes of the Capital Requirements Regulation (CRR) (Regulation (EU) 575/2013). The consultation runs until 20 April 2016.
The guidelines were developed pursuant to Article 248 of the CRR, which lays down restrictions on sponsor institutions and originator institutions providing support to securitisations beyond their contractual obligations. The guidelines also elaborate further on the notification and documentation requirements of Article 248(1) of the CRR. The guidelines are without prejudice to the ongoing assessment of significant risk transfer during the life of the securitisation.
The Council of the European Union has announced that it is to postpone the application date of the Regulation on key information documents for PRIIPs (Regulation 1286/2014, known as the 'PRIIPs Regulation') by 12 months. It will now be applied from 1 January 2018, instead of 31 December 2016 as initially stipulated.
The European Commission has adopted a proposal for a framework for the recovery and resolution of central counterparties (CCPs) which amends the Regulation establishing a European Supervisory Authority (Regulation (EU) 1095/2010), the European Markets Infrastructure Regulation (Regulation (EU) No 648/2012) (EMIR) and the Securities Financing Transactions Regulation (Regulation (EU) 2015/2365) (SFTR). The proposal discusses its objectives, including the scale and importance of CCPs in Europe and beyond, which is set to increase via EMIR in its implementation of the G20 commitment to clear, standardised derivatives transacted OTC through CCPs. EMIR also sets out comprehensive prudential requirements for CCPs, as well as requirements regarding their operations and oversight. One of the reasons for bringing about the proposal is that there is currently a lack of harmonised EU rules to deal with CCPs facing severe stress or outright failure beyond the instances envisaged by EMIR. Past crises illustrated that the failure of an important financial institution that is highly interconnected with others in the financial markets can cause critical problems for the rest of the financial system.
From 16 December 2016, the special resolution regime for banks and investment firms is amended to strengthen and clarify the UK’s transposition of the EU Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive 2014/59/EU (BRRD).
The Order implements in part Directive 2014/59/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 establishing a framework for the recovery and resolution of credit institutions and investment firms.
The Directive requires EEA states to have powers to manage the failure of credit institutions and investment firms and their group companies as an alternative to insolvency, in order to ensure that critical functions continue to be performed.
The Order amends the Banking Act 2009 to complete the implementation of BRRD.
The LMA has published updated company and lender co-ordinating committee appointment letters along with accompanying guidance notes. It has also launched a rider designed for use where funds or other non-bank lenders are serving as members of the co-ordinating committee.
Among the key changes made to the co-ordinating letters:
The revised documentation can be viewed by members on the LMA website.
0330 161 1234