LMA Quarterly Briefing Q1 2018: Plant v Vision Games and Singularis v Daiwa Capital Markets Europe

LMA Quarterly Briefing Q1 2018: Plant v Vision Games and Singularis v Daiwa Capital Markets Europe

In this briefing, Natalie Butchart, a solicitor in the LexisPSL Banking & Finance team, looks at the case of Plant and another (administrators of Relentless Software Ltd) v Vision Games 1 Ltd and others [2018] EWHC 108 (Ch), which considered whether or not a lender had any security or other proprietary interest

Subscription Form

Related Articles:
Latest Articles:

Already a subscriber? Login
RELX (UK) Limited, trading as LexisNexis, and our LexisNexis Legal & Professional group companies will contact you to confirm your email address. You can manage your communication preferences via our Preference Centre. You can learn more about how we handle your personal data and your rights by reviewing our  Privacy Policy.

Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.

Read full article

Already a subscriber? Login

About the author:

Neeta has been working as a paralegal in Banking and Insolvency for the past 4 and a half years.

She started her legal career at Allen & Overy in 2008 in the midst of the global financial crisis and the collapse of Lehmans where she gained most of her experience.

Neeta also did a short stint in litigation at the Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office. Neeta graduated with a 2:1 honours degree from University of London, Queen Mary College and went on to obtain a distinction from the College of Law in the Legal Practice Course. She moved to Lexis®PSL in April 2013.