Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Caroline Edwards, partner and David Thomas, solicitor at Travers Smith, discuss the key cases and developments in relation to financial contracts.
A large number of cases concerning complex financial contracts have come before the courts in the last 12 months. The following decisions are of particular interest:
In this case the defendant sought to disclaim various transactions that it had entered into under an International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) Master Agreement in order to avoid liabilities to the claimant. It claimed that it did not have authority to conclude the transactions, despite the ISDA Master Agreement including representations and warranties that stated that it did. The court held that, while the transactions were made without authority, and therefore void:
The case is the latest attempt made by a public body to disclaim an interest rate swap, which can be traced to the early '90s cases of Hazell v Hammersmith and Fulham London Borough Council  2 QB 697,  3 All ER 33 and Westdeutsche Landesbank Girozentrale v Islington London Borough Council,  AC 669,  2 All ER 961. This decision is currently under appeal (that appeal will be heard in July 2015). Dexia Crediop SpA v Provincia Di Crotone and Banco Santander Totta v Companhia Carris de Ferro de Lisboa, which are currently
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
Miranda is a solicitor specialising in leveraged and acquisition finance. She trained at Hogan Lovells International LLP and qualified into the international banking and finance team. During her time at Hogan Lovells she worked on a variety of domestic and cross-border transactions, acting for both borrowers and lenders. She also experienced secondments to Barclays Bank PLC and Kaupthing Bank hf.
0330 161 1234