Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
The government is proposing to nullify bans on invoice assignment terms on business-to-business commercial contracts. The proposals are part of its plans to remove barriers to invoice finance. It is seeking views on its proposals, the draft regulations which would implement them and the costs and benefits of the measures on both companies and the invoice finance market. The measure would nullify any bans on assignment of receivables included in contracts (with certain exceptions) after the regulations have come into force. It would bring the law in England and Wales more in line with the position under the US Uniform Commercial Code and under the UNCITRAL (United Nations Commission on International Trade Law) Convention on the Assignment of Receivables in International Trade. Comments should be submitted by 11 February 2015.
Invoice financing is where a supplier sells the right to future payment of an invoice by its customer to a finance provider in exchange for a loan. When the customer pays the relevant invoice, the supplier will remit the amount due in respect of the invoice to the finance provider in repayment of the loan. By allowing the supplier to receive money in respect of an invoice before the customer has paid it, invoice financing effectively accelerates payment terms and smooths a company's cash-flow. It is therefore a useful financing technique, particularly for SMEs—use of which the government wishes to encourage.
Under English law, 'in the absence of the clearest words' prohibiting assignment, a party to a contract is entitled to assign its rights under that contract (see Don King Productions Inc v Warren and others  All ER (D) 114). If the assignment is notified in writing to the other party to the contract, then a legal assignment will have been created (and the assignee will be entitled to issue proceedings directly against that other party for payment). If it is not notified, the assignment will take place in equity only.
However, the courts will equally uphold an appropriately drafted ban on an assignment of rights included in a contract (on the ground of parties' general freedom to contract). If such a clause is included in a contract between a supplier and a customer for the supply of goods and services, the supplier will not be entitled to assign its right to payment in respect of an invoice issued under the contract to a finance provider. If such a prohibition on assignment is included in a contract, finance providers and suppliers would have to either:
It is considered that this adds unnecessary cost and inconvenience to businesses' operations. Further, the ban on invoice assignment is often merely the consequence of a generic ban on assignment intended to ensure a supplier does not sub-contract its services. In these cases, a business’s access to invoice finance is curtailed unintentionally and unnecessarily.
The proposal is to introduce legislation which will render null any contractual ban on the assignment of receivables in contracts to which it applies. The legislation would apply to any contract for the supply of goods, services or intangible assets other than an 'excluded contract'.
A contract is excluded if:
Companies that may benefit from the legislation include any company that provides goods, intangible assets (such as intellectual property) and services (other than pursuant to an excluded contract) and can benefit from trade receivables financing. It would seem that the legislation will also facilitate trade receivables securitisations, but not other types of securitisations where the receivables do not arise under supply contracts.
The paper requests input on a number of areas including the following:
Firms involved in advising finance providers and companies that use or would benefit from using invoice financing may wish to comment. The deadline for comments is 11 February 2015 and further details are set out in the consultation document.
Fraser Wood, solicitor in the Lexis®PSL Banking & Finance team.
The views expressed by our Legal Analysis interviewees are not necessarily those of the proprietor.
First published on LexisPSL Banking & Finance. Click here for a free trial.
0330 161 1234