Effective termination of a repo (Lehman Brothers International (Europe) v Exxonmobil Financial Services)

Effective termination of a repo (Lehman Brothers International (Europe) v Exxonmobil Financial Services)

A recent decision in the Lehmans insolvency discusses the construction of the termination provisions in the Global Master Repurchase Agreement (GMRA), how these provisions are effected in practice and how the securities should be valued

Original news

Lehman Brothers International (Europe) v Exxonmobil Financial Services BV [2016] EWHC 2699 (Comm)

The claimant, Lehman Brothers, contended that a default valuation notice served by Exxon wasinvalid and the valuations ascribed to the securities were incorrect. The Commercial Court held, among other things, that the default valuation notice had been validly exercised and that the valuation had to be rational even if it wasnot objectively reasonable.

What are the practical implications of this case

This case highlights the possible complications that can arise when following termination provisions under a master agreement.

In this case, the trades were governed under a GMRA. The GMRA sets out its termination provisions under section 10. In section 10(e), a 'Default Valuation Notice' (DVN) is defined. The definition does not include specific language that should be included in the DVN. It merely states that it is a written notice which:

'states that, since the occurrence of the relevant Event of Default, the non-Defaulting party has sold, in the case of Receivable Securities, or purchased, in the case of Deliverable Securities, Securities which form part of the same issue and are of an identical type and description as those Equivalent Securities or Equivalent Margin Securities'

The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) master agreement includes its early termination provisions under Section 6 and similarly does not set out a sample notice or generic wording that should be included when terminating that notice early.

The case suggests that practitioners should be careful in ensuring that notices are delivered in a timely way and follow the procedures set out in the master agreement precisely.

What wasthis

Subscription Form

Already a subscriber? Login
RELX (UK) Limited, trading as LexisNexis, and our LexisNexis Legal & Professional group companies will contact you to confirm your email address. You can manage your communication preferences via our Preference Centre. You can learn more about how we handle your personal data and your rights by reviewing our  Privacy Policy.

Related Articles:
Latest Articles:

Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.

Read full article

Already a subscriber? Login

About the author:

Emma is head of the Banking and Finance team and the Finance Group at LexisNexis®UK.

Emma has wide-ranging experience in derivatives and capital markets with a particular emphasis on credit derivatives and structured products. Emma qualified as a solicitor with Allen & Overy LLP, working in the derivatives and structured finance teams in both their London and Paris offices before gaining experience with Deutsche Bank AG (advising the foreign exchange prime brokerage desk) and Crédit Agricole CIB (advising the fixed income and derivatives desk) before joining LexisNexis®.