Contractual interpretation in recent capital markets cases

Contractual interpretation in recent capital markets cases

Following a raft of capital markets cases in 2014, Matthew Waudby, Harriet Jones-Fenleigh and Adam Sanitt, from Norton Rose Fulbright, discuss some of these cases which feature issues of contractual interpretation.

Click here to access the capital market cases round up which covers:

  • Greenclose Ltd v National Westminster Bank plc [2014] EWHC 1156 (Ch)
  • Napier Park v Harbourmaster Pro-Rata CLO 2 BV [2014] EWCA Civ 984
  • US Bank Trustees Ltd v Titan Europe 2007-1 (NHP) Ltd [2014] EWHC 1189 (Ch)
  • Barclays Bank plc v Unicredit Bank AG [2014] EWCA Civ 302

This article first appeared in the October 2014 edition of the Norton Rose Fulbright ‘Banking and finance disputes review’.

Related Articles:
Latest Articles:
About the author:

Emma is head of the Banking and Finance team and the Finance Group at LexisNexis®UK.

Emma has wide-ranging experience in derivatives and capital markets with a particular emphasis on credit derivatives and structured products. Emma qualified as a solicitor with Allen & Overy LLP, working in the derivatives and structured finance teams in both their London and Paris offices before gaining experience with Deutsche Bank AG (advising the foreign exchange prime brokerage desk) and Crédit Agricole CIB (advising the fixed income and derivatives desk) before joining LexisNexis®.