Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
Find up-to-date guidance on points of law and then easily pull up sources to support your advice with Lexis PSL
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Discuss the latest legal developments, ask questions, and share best practice with other LexisPSL subscribers
Is an internal swap a ‘funding transaction’ for the purposes of a loan agreement?
Barnett Waddington Trustees (1980) Ltd and another v Royal Bank of Scotland  EWHC 2435 (Ch),  All ER (D) 82 (Aug)
The key issue in the case was whether an internal swap qualified as a ‘funding transaction’ under a loan agreement and the costs of unwinding it would therefore be payable if the borrowers prepaid the loan. The court held that an internal swap between divisions of the lending bank was not a transaction as a transaction involved two different legal entities. The bank was therefore not entitled to claim the costs from the borrower. The case highlights the importance of ensuring provisions in the loan agreement reflect the ways in which fund and hedge fixed rate loans in practice.
This case concerned a situation which very often arises in commercial bank lending—the bank, in this case RBS, advanced a long-term fixed rate loan to a group of borrowers to finance the purchase of a property and funded the loan and hedged its interest rate exposure by a four-step process.
Step one was to obtain funding from external sources, presumably by a mix of borrowing in the interbank and capital markets and taking deposits from customers. For the bank’s accounting purposes, funds so obtained where treated as being held by its group treasury, an internal division of the bank and not a separate legal entity.
Step two was a floating rate loan from group treasury to the bank’s corporate banking division, also an internal division of the bank. In this way the corporate banking division obtained floating rate funding for its fixed rate loan to the borrowers.
Step three was a fixed to floating rate ‘internal swap’ between the bank’s corporate banking division and the bank’s interest rates desk, another internal division of the bank. In this way the corporate banking division hedged
Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.
Read full article
Already a subscriber? Login
0330 161 1234