Rely on the most comprehensive, up-to-date legal content designed and curated by lawyers for lawyers
Work faster and smarter to improve your drafting productivity without increasing risk
Accelerate the creation and use of high quality and trusted legal documents and forms
Streamline how you manage your legal business with proven tools and processes
Manage risk and compliance in your organisation to reduce your risk profile
Stay up to date and informed with insights from our trusted experts, news and information sources
Access the best content in the industry, effortlessly — confident that your news is trustworthy and up to date.
With over 30 practice areas, we have all bases covered. Find out how we can help
Our trusted tax intelligence solutions, highly-regarded exam training and education materials help guide and tutor Tax professionals
Regulatory, business information and analytics solutions that help professionals make better decisions
A leading provider of software platforms for professional services firms
In-depth analysis, commentary and practical information to help you protect your business
LexisNexis Blogs shed light on topics affecting the legal profession and the issues you're facing
Legal professionals trust us to help navigate change. Find out how we help ensure they exceed expectations
Lex Chat is a LexisNexis current affairs podcast sharing insights on topics for the legal profession
Printer Friendly Version
Francesco Liberatore, partner at Squire Patton Boggs, examines the European Commission’s final report, ‘EU loan syndication and its impact on competition in credit markets’, which evaluates the loan syndication market and whether lenders in certain Member States are able to violate anti-trust rules when collaborating in loan syndication work.
On 5 April 2019, the European Commission published its final report on EU loan syndication and its impact on competition in credit markets, focussing on specific segments of the syndicated loan market, namely those connected with leveraged buy-outs (LBOs), project finance and infrastructure finance. The aim of this market study was to assess the loan syndication market in terms of its effectiveness and functioning, and to identify potential competition concerns. The study concentrates on those Member States that are the most significant in terms of the location of borrowers, lenders and investors, which are France, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain and the UK.
The European Commission’s interest in syndicated lending is not new. In its 2017 management plan, the European Commission had indicated that it would engage in a study on potential competition issues relating to loan syndication. At the time, the European Commission described this as an area that:
‘Exhibits close co-operation between market participants in opaque or in transparent settings, such as over-the-counter activities, which are particularly vulnerable to anti-competitive conduct.’
The European Commission is not alone in expressing an interest in the sector. The Spanish Competition Authority and the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) have both investigated instances of alleged collusion in the manipulation of price for syndicated lending, although the UK probe was resolved by way of commitments, while the Spanish case resulted in an infringement decision.
Against this background, after nearly two years, the study (prepared by Europe Economics and Euclid for the European Commission) is the first comprehensive assessment of this segment of the capital markets and aims to identify whether lenders may violate anti-trust rules when working together in loan syndication scenarios. It focuses on six Member States (France, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain and the UK). The analysis examines three specific segments of the syndicated loan market:
While the European Commission explicitly notes that it has not taken a position on what is falling within or outside the scope of anti-trust rules regarding syndicated lending, the 324-page study has the potential of making syndicated lending the next frontier of anti-trust enforcement within the financial services sector, after foreign exchange.
According to the study, the sector displays certain market dynamics that could give rise to a competition law risk, including information sharing, cooperation, vertical market power and misaligned incentives that may give rise to sub-optimal loan terms or sub-optimal market outcomes. The study also points out that lenders have bargaining power when borrowers are in financial difficulties. Based on these market dynamics, the study identifies the following key issues by reference to the stage of the process of syndicated lending and by market segment:
At this stage, the European Commission and national competition authorities will likely use the study to inform their understanding of the sector and assess whether and where to intervene. The European Commission could also decide to launch a sector inquiry, if it thinks that a market is not working as it should and believes that competition law breaches might be a contributory factor. At the same time, the national competition agencies could also launch individual investigations if they suspect any specific conduct in their respective jurisdictions.
Brexit would be unlikely to affect an EU sector inquiry or an EU-wide investigation assuming a Brexit extension until the end of October 2019. Furthermore, sector inquiries often result in individual investigations from an early stage of the inquiry (eg pharmaceuticals, telecommunications, energy) either at EU or national level. However, because of Brexit, any individual investigation in the UK could well be deferred by the European Commission to the UK’s FCA or Competition and Markets Authority within the European Competition Network. If the European Commission does decide to launch an inquiry, banks and other parties can expect information requests that will be lengthy, and the European Commission can carry out inspections based on those requests.
The study notes a number of safeguards that can mitigate the competition law risk in practice. With regard to market sounding and the exchange of (pricing) information, the study suggests establishing protocols that limit exchange to deal-specific information, setting out how this kind of information may be transferred, and to avoid alignment of prices. The regular use (and enforcement) of non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) is also referred to several times throughout the study as a risk mitigation strategy.
As to the risk of the syndicate tying ancillary services to the main loan, the study finds that it is advisable for syndicates to carefully manage and limit the cross-sale of services in order to avoid the risk of impairing competitive conditions in neighbouring markets. The study recommends keeping ancillary services separate if they are not directly linked to the loan itself.
Generally, the study recommends the adoption of compliance measures, especially competition law training for relevant staff highlighting the risks of co-operation and the establishment of policies regarding critical communications.
Against this background, banks and lenders should make sure to have in place appropriate anti-trust compliance safeguards, such as regular training for staff, template protocols for syndication processes and NDAs.
Interviewed by Devon Marshall.
The views expressed by our Legal Analysis interviewees are not necessarily those of the proprietor.
0330 161 1234