After the vote for Brexit—implications for project finance

After the vote for Brexit—implications for project finance

Philip Vernon, global practice co-head of corporate projects at Ashurst, sets out his view on the short-term and long-term implications for project finance.

Has the UK’s vote in favour of Brexit had any immediate effects on funding for infrastructure projects? What do you think will be the long-term effects on such funding?

Immediate impact of market volatility

It was natural to expect an initial tightening of credit markets following the Brexit vote. Stock and currency exchange volatility and changes to inflation and interest rate expectations have had a destabilising effect. The majority of economists were clear that Brexit would have negative repercussions—differing only on the predicted degree of severity. It is, therefore, not surprising to see how markets have reacted, especially as they had seemingly priced in a Remain vote. This translated into a falling pound, concerns about the UK commercial real estate sector, and also wider anxiety about the financial health of certain European banks.

Credit markets are generally more resilient than during the global financial crisis (GFC)

Early market evidence, as reflected in the July Bank of England Financial Stability Report, suggests that for many UK borrowers any increase in margin cost has been more than offset by tightening gilts yields or wholesale funding costs. This is encouraging when compared to the funding cost ‘blow-outs’ of the GFC.

Most commentators expect the credit markets to be more resilient than was the case during the GFC. In particular, despite the initial bank downgrades and sell-offs, many banks are thought to be in a stronger position than they were during the GFC in terms of their ability to withstand both short-term shocks and longer-term underperformance of the economy. Even if wholesale funding costs increase, the capital and liquidity positions of most banks have improved materially and are likely to benefit further from the monetary stimulus policies of the central banks. For

Subscription Form

Related Articles:
Latest Articles:

Already a subscriber? Login
RELX (UK) Limited, trading as LexisNexis, and our LexisNexis Legal & Professional group companies will contact you to confirm your email address. You can manage your communication preferences via our Preference Centre. You can learn more about how we handle your personal data and your rights by reviewing our  Privacy Policy.

Access this article and thousands of others like it free by subscribing to our blog.

Read full article

Already a subscriber? Login

About the author:

Meet Kate:

1. Banking & finance lawyer with experience in syndicated lending and project finance in London, Paris and Sydney

2. Likes yoga, DIY (although the output doesn’t generally reflect the input) and sunny climes

3. Thinks the law is very unlike how LA Law made it look

Kate is a solicitor specialising in banking and finance with particular emphasis on syndicated lending and project finance. She has acted for both borrowers and lenders on a wide range of finance transactions, often involving multiple jurisdictions.

Kate trained and qualified in the Debt and Derivative Securities team at Allen & Overy LLP. She later joined the Banking and Finance team at Freehills (now Herbert Smith Freehills) in Sydney. Most recently, she was in the Projects and Infrastructure team at Norton Rose LLP before joining LexisNexis. Kate is dual-qualified in England and Wales and New South Wales, Australia.